STRATA IQ Explains · Episode 10 · 5-minute read

Can Your Strata Building Ban Airbnb?

Before proposing a short-stay ban, check whose home it is, the registered by-laws and the rules that apply to the use.

NSW strata committees, owners, assistants, managers and licenseesBy Silvestro MusumeciPublished 4 November 2026
Official STRATA IQ Academy crest above a modern apartment entrance and suitcase. STRATA IQ Explains #10: Can Strata Ban Airbnb?
Start with the right question

A suitcase appears in the lift. A neighbour says the apartment upstairs is being advertised for short stays. Someone asks the committee to ban Airbnb throughout the building.

Before drafting a motion, pause. The booking platform does not decide the legal position. The use of the property, the host’s principal place of residence, the scheme’s registered by-laws and the applicable planning rules all matter.

Why does the host’s home matter?

Section 137A of the Strata Schemes Management Act 2015 gives an owners corporation a particular power: by special resolution, it may adopt a by-law prohibiting short-term rental accommodation where the lot is not the principal place of residence of the person granting the right to occupy it.

The statutory test concerns the person granting the right to occupy the lot, who is not necessarily its registered owner.

The section also sets a limit. A by-law has no effect to the extent that it purports to prohibit that short-term letting where the lot is that person’s principal place of residence.

NSW guidance explains that this protection can apply while the person is temporarily away. An absent host does not automatically mean the apartment has stopped being their principal residence. Establish the facts; avoid treating an advertisement or an unfamiliar face as the complete answer.

Two fictional examples

The resident’s home: A person normally lives in the apartment and offers it for a short stay while away. That temporary absence alone does not remove the principal-residence protection. Planning, registration and conduct rules still need checking.

A separate investment apartment: The person offering the apartment lives elsewhere, and this lot is not their principal residence. The owners corporation may be able to prohibit its use for short-term rental accommodation through a valid by-law adopted and recorded through the correct process.

Who can make the restriction?

The committee cannot create this restriction simply by deciding it at a committee meeting. Section 137A requires an owners corporation special resolution at a general meeting. Under the Act’s voting test, no more than 25% of the value of votes cast may be against the resolution; value is calculated by unit entitlement. It is not simply a headcount of all owners.

A properly drafted by-law must stay within the statutory power and other limits on by-laws. Section 141 requires the owners corporation to lodge the required notice within six months of the special resolution. The change has no effect until the notice has been lodged and the Registrar-General has recorded it. Obtain advice on wording and registration rather than copying another building’s rule without checking it.

Planning and registration are separate checks

The strata by-law question does not replace planning requirements. Check whether the premises and proposed use qualify under the applicable planning framework, any location-specific limits, the NSW short-term rental accommodation register and fire-safety requirements. Hosts and guests also have obligations under the mandatory Code of Conduct. Ask for relevant registration evidence where appropriate; the register is not a general public search of host or premises details.

Planning guidance distinguishes hosted accommodation, where the host resides at the premises during the stay, from non-hosted accommodation, where they do not. That distinction is different from the principal-residence test in section 137A. A principal residence can be used for a non-hosted stay while its resident is away.

Do not assume a registration number overrides a valid strata restriction, or that the absence of a strata ban settles every planning question. Check exempt-development eligibility and any relevant consent conditions with the local council where needed. Plan a fair transition for existing bookings when considering a new restriction.

What if the problem is noise or behaviour?

Identify the conduct that is actually causing concern. Noise, obstruction or other behaviour may engage an applicable registered by-law, the statutory nuisance provisions or the Code of Conduct. A lawful short-term letting arrangement does not excuse misconduct. Equally, the fact of short-term letting does not automatically establish a breach or nuisance.

Good practice is to record dates, times and the nature of the alleged conduct, check the relevant rule and give the affected person an opportunity to respond. Use the correct authority and enforcement pathway. Planning and fire-safety concerns may need the council; Code complaints may need Fair Trading. A strata by-law complaint needs the scheme’s proper decision-making process. Avoid replacing an investigation into a particular incident with an unsupported building-wide ban.

A committee’s decision guide

  • What use is taking place? Confirm the arrangement and the relevant premises rather than relying on assumptions.
  • Whose principal residence is it? Check the position of the person granting occupation. Temporary absence alone does not settle it.
  • What is already registered? Obtain the scheme’s current by-laws and any relevant approval history.
  • What other requirements apply? Check planning eligibility, location-specific limits, registration, fire safety and the Code.
  • What problem are we solving? Separate a proposed restriction on use from a complaint about particular conduct.
  • Who has authority? A new section 137A restriction needs the owners corporation’s special resolution, timely lodgment and recording. Seek appropriate advice on wording, transition and process.
Why it matters

Different questions need different evidence

A proposed restriction on use, a planning concern and a complaint about behaviour may involve different rules and different decision-makers. Separating them helps the committee choose the right process.

One practical action

Before proposing a ban, prepare a one-page record separating the principal-residence question, the registered by-law question and the evidence of any actual misconduct.

The practical takeaway

Check the home, the rule and the conduct before deciding what the scheme can do. How is easy when you know the why.

Sources and review status:

NSW Government short-term rental, planning and strata by-law guidance rechecked 4 November 2026 and reconciled with sections 5, 137A, 141 and 153 of the supplied Act as at 23 October 2026. The principal-residence distinction is also confirmed by the linked NSW Parliament ministerial answer. Direct retrieval of the latest official Act consolidation and AustLII was unavailable; this review does not claim a fresh retrieval of that consolidation. General NSW strata education, not government guidance or advice on a particular scheme. Check the current law and scheme documents before acting.

Continue when useful

Turn the explanation into practice.

Open the linked Guide or Academy pathway when you need the complete checks, official sources and practical learning.

Explore Airbnb & Short-Term Rentals learning (members)
© 2026 Strata IQ Academy. Share the link to this complete insight for non-commercial professional learning. Do not edit, rebrand or present it as scheme-specific advice.